RSS | Archive | Random | e-mail

about

We hardly don't even know what we are doing.

contributors

jpjayp
nerdness
plaidout
simplesinger
laragazzabreve
qck

Find

Powered by Tumblr
18 May 13 by jpjayp
artworkofkatiebarron:

I drew this during my Contemporary Art class…

artworkofkatiebarron:

I drew this during my Contemporary Art class…

Reblogged: theonlymagicleftisart

17 May 13 by laragazzabreve
we-are-star-stuff:

Who says North is up?
Upside Down maps (also known as South-Up or Reversed maps) offer a completely different perspective of the world we live in.
Technically speaking, even referring to the earth with words like “up” or “down” or comparing places with words “above” or “below” is flawed, considering that the earth is a spherical body (it’s actually slightly “fatter” at the equator) and flying through 3 dimensional space with no reference of up or down. However, the issue of “up” and “down” does become an issue when viewing the surface of the earth projected onto a flat piece of paper (a map). And the effect of the orientation of a map is more significant than you might realize.
As all maps require orientation for reference, the issue of how to layout the map orientation is as old as maps themselves. As map orientation is completely arbitrary, it is not surprising that they differed throughout time periods and regions.
The convention of North-up is usually attributed to the Egyptian astronomer Ptolemy (90-168 AD). Justifications for his north-up approach vary. In the middle ages, East was often placed at top. This is the origin of the term “The Orient” to refer to East Asia. During the age of exploration, European cartographers again followed the north-up convention…perhaps because the North Star was their fixed reference point for navigation, or because they wanted (subconsciously or otherwise) to ensure Europe’s claim at the top of the world.
In modern times, reversed maps are made as a learning device or to illustrate Northern Hemisphere bias. Different from simply turning a north-up map upside down, a reversed map has the text oriented to be read with south up.
The famous “Blue Marble” photograph of the Earth taken from on board Apollo 17 was originally oriented with the south pole at the top, with the island of Madagascar visible just left of center, and the continent of Africa at its right. However, the image was turned upside-down to fit the traditional view.
While the orientation of a map might seem harmless, it can have a significant effect on one’s perception of the world, and the relative importance of the different place in it.
In speech, we often refer to places being “above” or “below” others. Think of how you would say you’re about to travel to the state or country to your north or south (to go “down” to Kentucky from Indiana, or “up” to Canada from the US). Without even mentioning geography, ask any grade school student whether Mexico is “above” or “below” the United States. We’re all familiar with the “land down under”. As we often correlate importance to relative height (think how a citizens of a country will fly their flag higher than all other flags), the north-up convention reinforces the idea that northern bodies are more important than their southern neighbors. Suddenly, traveling “down” to the South might have an inference much deeper than geographic location.
After looking at the map more closely, you may realize that the South-Up orientation may change your perception of the relative status of different places. For example, South America suddenly looks to have more prominence, and Africa and the Middle East completely dwarf Europe. Likewise, tucking Northern Europe, Canada, and Russia away at the bottom of the map, subconsciously takes away their status.
To summarize, unconditionally accepting the north-up map convention without at least appreciating the effect stands at odds with viewing all people and places within the world equally. x x

jpjayp couldn’t have said it better himself.

we-are-star-stuff:

Who says North is up?

Upside Down maps (also known as South-Up or Reversed maps) offer a completely different perspective of the world we live in.

Technically speaking, even referring to the earth with words like “up” or “down” or comparing places with words “above” or “below” is flawed, considering that the earth is a spherical body (it’s actually slightly “fatter” at the equator) and flying through 3 dimensional space with no reference of up or down. However, the issue of “up” and “down” does become an issue when viewing the surface of the earth projected onto a flat piece of paper (a map). And the effect of the orientation of a map is more significant than you might realize.

As all maps require orientation for reference, the issue of how to layout the map orientation is as old as maps themselves. As map orientation is completely arbitrary, it is not surprising that they differed throughout time periods and regions.

The convention of North-up is usually attributed to the Egyptian astronomer Ptolemy (90-168 AD). Justifications for his north-up approach vary. In the middle ages, East was often placed at top. This is the origin of the term “The Orient” to refer to East Asia. During the age of exploration, European cartographers again followed the north-up convention…perhaps because the North Star was their fixed reference point for navigation, or because they wanted (subconsciously or otherwise) to ensure Europe’s claim at the top of the world.

In modern times, reversed maps are made as a learning device or to illustrate Northern Hemisphere bias. Different from simply turning a north-up map upside down, a reversed map has the text oriented to be read with south up.

The famous “Blue Marble” photograph of the Earth taken from on board Apollo 17 was originally oriented with the south pole at the top, with the island of Madagascar visible just left of center, and the continent of Africa at its right. However, the image was turned upside-down to fit the traditional view.

While the orientation of a map might seem harmless, it can have a significant effect on one’s perception of the world, and the relative importance of the different place in it.

In speech, we often refer to places being “above” or “below” others. Think of how you would say you’re about to travel to the state or country to your north or south (to go “down” to Kentucky from Indiana, or “up” to Canada from the US). Without even mentioning geography, ask any grade school student whether Mexico is “above” or “below” the United States. We’re all familiar with the “land down under”. As we often correlate importance to relative height (think how a citizens of a country will fly their flag higher than all other flags), the north-up convention reinforces the idea that northern bodies are more important than their southern neighbors. Suddenly, traveling “down” to the South might have an inference much deeper than geographic location.

After looking at the map more closely, you may realize that the South-Up orientation may change your perception of the relative status of different places. For example, South America suddenly looks to have more prominence, and Africa and the Middle East completely dwarf Europe. Likewise, tucking Northern Europe, Canada, and Russia away at the bottom of the map, subconsciously takes away their status.

To summarize, unconditionally accepting the north-up map convention without at least appreciating the effect stands at odds with viewing all people and places within the world equally. x x

jpjayp couldn’t have said it better himself.

Reblogged: loveyourchaos

Posted: 3:56 PM by simplesinger

johnnyauer:

Shot by Nathan Michael, edited and produced by yours truly, with original music by Michael Pietrus for Knob Creek.

The Knob Creek Big Flavor Dinner Series is on the move and coming to a city near you.

Reblogged: johnnyauer

16 May 13 by laragazzabreve

pleatedjeans:

six seconds well spent. [best vines][eric dunn]

Reblogged: pleatedjeans

Posted: 5:18 PM by jpjayp
I’ve never read any of her work but now it looks like I’m all caught up.

I’ve never read any of her work but now it looks like I’m all caught up.

Posted: 5:15 PM by jpjayp

shortformblog:

The Legend of Ron Burgundy came to life this week when Australia TODAY host Karl Stefanovic channeled his inner-Veronica Corningstone with a last-minute change to the teleprompter lines of guest-host Roz Kelly. We don’t know about you guys, but we’d probably do this to our coworkers every single day if we worked on a televised news broadcast of any kind. Then again, that might be why we don’t work on a televised news broadcast of any kind. (ht to Gawker) source

Reblogged: shortformblog

Posted: 4:41 PM by laragazzabreve

The Dzhokhar Tsarnaev Empathy Problem

newyorker:

In this week’s issue, Paul Bloom examines the latest empathy research and its role in policymaking: http://nyr.kr/135ouGr Here, he looks at how attractiveness influences empathy, particularly in the case of Boston bombing suspect Dzhokhar Tsarnaev: http://nyr.kr/13p9LX2

 

image

Photograph by Robin Young

Reblogged: newyorker

15 May 13 by jpjayp
withapencilinhand:

i think this would make a better time cover of todays generation

withapencilinhand:

i think this would make a better time cover of todays generation

Reblogged: theonlymagicleftisart

Posted: 4:11 PM by jpjayp
Leo: I need a favor: the President’s gonna be getting a phone call and I don’t want him to take it and I don’t want him to know why.
Charlie: The first part’s okay, the second part gets ethically tricky.
[…]
Charlie: So someone’s complaining to the President?
Leo: Yes. 
Charlie: Who?
Leo: The Secretary-General.
Charlie: You want me to have the President dodge a call from the U.N. Secretary-General and not know why?
Leo: Yeah, could you swing that?
Charlie: If I could, that would be troubling, wouldn’t it? 
Petite’s West Wing Gifs! [9/∞]
↳ Charlie YoungPresident Jed Bartlet, and Leo McGarry
 
Memos, Phone Calls, and Parking Tickets {4.10 - Arctic Winter}

Reblogged: thefinestmuffinsandbagels

Posted: 12:12 PM by simplesinger
13 May 13 by jpjayp
For just $6,000, the distillery will partner with a licensed retailer to bring you your own 30 gallon barrel. Just pick the grain bill, the yeast, the barrel, the age, the proof and the name and wait for delivery in the mail. Once completed, your 80 proof stock will be able to produce about 160 bottles of finished whiskey, which, if you decide to sell them, will end up working out to about $38 per bottle.

Now You Can Have Your Own Personal Brand of Whiskey

Who’s in? Divide this by 12 and I think we got a deal.

Posted: 8:49 PM by jpjayp
Taco Bell is currently testing the sale of breakfast tacos. Continue along with your day.

Taco Bell is currently testing the sale of breakfast tacos. Continue along with your day.

Posted: 4:42 PM by jpjayp
nevver:

Happiness vs. Money

I firmly believe this to be true.

nevver:

Happiness vs. Money

I firmly believe this to be true.

Reblogged: moneyisnotimportant

Posted: 4:03 PM by simplesinger
tankboy:

irockitumblr:

world-shaker:

Productivity (20px)

seems accurate to me

Painfully true.

tankboy:

irockitumblr:

world-shaker:

Productivity (20px)

seems accurate to me

Painfully true.

Reblogged: tankboy

12 May 13 by laragazzabreve
My daughter wasn’t born into royalty, but she was born into a country where she can now vote, become a doctor, a pilot, an astronaut, or even President if she wants and that’s what REALLY matters. I wanted her to know the value of these amazing women who had gone against everything so she can now have everything.
Themed by Hunson. Originally by Josh